Hello,
I recently found a stray cat near my house in the countryside, she only looked about 4 months old and when I went to look at her I could see she was homeless and in severe need of feeding. I decided to give her shelter for the night. When I went to check on her in the morning she had given birth to 4 kittens!! Unfortunately 3 were still born and the survivor was extremely small & unresponsive. I called the RSPCA who took both mother & kitten to a nearby RSPCA hospital.
The next day I got a call to say they had unfortunately had to put her kitten down, but that Mum (who is only a kitten herself) is doing ok. It was then I decided I'd like to adopt her. They had to keep her in for 2 weeks for care and to give any previous owners a chance to come forward. I then had a home check on Friday which went fine and I was hoping to pick her up the following day.
Then disaster struck...I got a call from the RSPCA hospital to say they had found a small bald patch on her neck and decided to send off a sample to test for ringworm. They assured me it could be various things such as reaction to flea treatment, scratching at her cone collar (which she wore after being spayed) or even just stress of being in an unfamiliar place. They told me the test would take 7-12 days but if they did find she had ringworm I wouldn't be able to adopt her..So I asked what would happen and they told me they would have to put her down!
I was quite accepting at the time of the call and felt quite grateful that they were doing something about it rather than just keeping quiet and letting me deal with it later down the line (which could have been a nightmare as we have other pets who could have caught the illness) But as I started telling people I was taken aback by the horrified reactions I got...
Which made me want to ask the question:
Is it wrong that they might put her down because of ringworm? Particularly because she is young and has a definite owner at the end of it...
Any opinions or comments would be really appreciated. : )
I recently found a stray cat near my house in the countryside, she only looked about 4 months old and when I went to look at her I could see she was homeless and in severe need of feeding. I decided to give her shelter for the night. When I went to check on her in the morning she had given birth to 4 kittens!! Unfortunately 3 were still born and the survivor was extremely small & unresponsive. I called the RSPCA who took both mother & kitten to a nearby RSPCA hospital.
The next day I got a call to say they had unfortunately had to put her kitten down, but that Mum (who is only a kitten herself) is doing ok. It was then I decided I'd like to adopt her. They had to keep her in for 2 weeks for care and to give any previous owners a chance to come forward. I then had a home check on Friday which went fine and I was hoping to pick her up the following day.
Then disaster struck...I got a call from the RSPCA hospital to say they had found a small bald patch on her neck and decided to send off a sample to test for ringworm. They assured me it could be various things such as reaction to flea treatment, scratching at her cone collar (which she wore after being spayed) or even just stress of being in an unfamiliar place. They told me the test would take 7-12 days but if they did find she had ringworm I wouldn't be able to adopt her..So I asked what would happen and they told me they would have to put her down!
I was quite accepting at the time of the call and felt quite grateful that they were doing something about it rather than just keeping quiet and letting me deal with it later down the line (which could have been a nightmare as we have other pets who could have caught the illness) But as I started telling people I was taken aback by the horrified reactions I got...
Which made me want to ask the question:
Is it wrong that they might put her down because of ringworm? Particularly because she is young and has a definite owner at the end of it...
Any opinions or comments would be really appreciated. : )