Just wondering about the frozen dog meat you buy at petsathome etc..minced chicken etc etc...anyone know how good it is for dogs compared to proper cooked meat?
The packet says you can use it cooked or raw!the ones that contain bone which i believe is all the minces should not be cooked
The point of raw feeding isn't just buying a bag of mince and giving that to your dog. It needs to be a balanced diet including many different meats etc to have a healthy dog.Is it not just chicken thats been minced?? why would that make any difference to chunks of chicken?
I dont believe the person who mentioned feeding it said anything about feeding *only* that...The point of raw feeding isn't just buying a bag of mince and giving that to your dog. It needs to be a balanced diet including many different meats etc to have a healthy dog.
Although an important point which needs raising and I agree, that's not the question asked as far as I see it. I'm not a fan of minces either. For me the major point of raw feeding is to clean the teeth. The cleanliness of the mouth has an impact on other internal organs and the ability for meat/bones to clean teeth is lacking for minces.The point of raw feeding isn't just buying a bag of mince and giving that to your dog. It needs to be a balanced diet including many different meats etc to have a healthy dog.
Minces are different in terms of bacterial contamination compared to chunks as there is, by comparison a much larger surface area. Also dogs don't chew minces so minces have no teeth cleaning action. Humans chew as the digestion starts in the mouth. A dog's mouth and dentition simply cuts food into small enough pieces to swallow.Is it not just chicken thats been minced?? why would that make any difference to chunks of chicken?
Sorry but I find this members posts offensive. He is trying to promote his own brand of dog food and not too subtlety. The raw feeders on here, including me, will promote the benefits that we've seen with our own eyes switching to raw.Firstly K, I used to like the PaH concept and approach but I'm afraid as with all larger concerns and supermarkets they've compromised and are more heavily now than ever in with Purina, thats Bakers, Beta and other poorer quality mainstream brands, sadly they also make their 'own brand'. Anyway, please don't feel you have to go down a raw feed route, it doesn't suit every dog anyway and you'll get too hooked up with the evangelicals of BARF. I don't go along with all they say and there are many good smaller producers of high quality dog food out there without all that faff about for no real long term benefits ( scientifically proven ). Frozen meat on their scale would worry me and I wouldn't feed my four dogs on it.
Call me stupid if you like but Ive just read his post 3 times and cant find a product hes promoting....have I missed something?Sorry but I find this members posts offensive. He is trying to promote his own brand of dog food and not too subtlety. The raw feeders on here, including me, will promote the benefits that we've seen with our own eyes switching to raw.
Perhaps if a PF customer was to rave about the benefits of this persons brand of dog food we would listen more. But as far as I can see this person comes onto any thread vaguely connected with raw feeding and starts scaremongering.
A number of people on PF have their own business which is dog related. We know it - they don't try and discredit other businesses.
If this person was on my forum I would ban him. I'm too suspicious of his sneaky approach.
Rant for the day over!
Yes, I know what post it was refering to, but the point i was making is the post didnt say that was the only thing they feed....Katheteria just mentioned the iceland mince, and was jumped on by pogo telling her thats not raw feeding and would make her dog ill.I think the post about giving your dog a bag of mince, refers to the person who posted about buying the mince from Iceland and feeding that, it's not really a varied diet. The dog might not die as a result of feeding bags of mince from Iceland (other food shops are available) but I'd prefer to see a more balanced diet.
You do need to research raw feeding rather than just jump into it, so it's right that you're asking questions now. For me there's no value in cooking food, if you are going to go down that route, you may as well feed kibble, which is cooked as well, it would save you he hassle.
Everyone seems to have jumped on to the raw feeding thing, assuming thats what I wanted to know, when in fact my OP was just asking about the quality of the meat, not for raw feeding at all.
Maybe that's whyId love to feed raw, but I dont think its for me...scares me silly!Just wondering if it is actually proper meat, and so as good as supermarket meat...or whether its just full of crap
why? Just because someone brought up raw...so I said I dont think its for me?Maybe that's why![]()
I didn't ask why. I pointed out that you said "I'd love to feed raw" and that's probably why some comments were made about it. If you'd said after the first post that brought raw up "I'm not interested in feeding raw, it's not for me" then the discussion would not have turned into one about raw feeding.why? Just because someone brought up raw...so I said I dont think its for me?
It still was not my original question...
I did ...."Sorry dont think I made my OP very clear...its not about raw feeding..."I didn't ask why. I pointed out that you said "I'd love to feed raw" and that's probably why some comments were made about it. If you'd said after the first post that brought raw up "I'm not interested in feeding raw, it's not for me" then the discussion would not have turned into one about raw feeding..
Says who? Who has decided this meat is meant for the raw feeding market, when it clearly says on the pack for raw or cooked?But an important point has actually been made. The minced chicken, etc., (which I think is all Prize Choice at Pets@Home) is really meant for the raw feeding market. Despite the fact that it says on the pack that it can be cooked as it could contain up to 4% bone, it's not really a good idea as cooking it could make the pieces of bone sharp and brittle and may cause a problem.
ThanksJust incase you were interested
http://www.petforums.co.uk/dog-health-nutrition/273288-feeding-dog-without-dog-food-3.html
When you say very slodgy and watery are you talking about the blocks? Ive found them very watery...but the bags of chicken mince Ive found is not too badI would definitely avoid cooking the PC mince, its not that good raw never mind being cooked. It's very slodgy and watery. Lucky isn't even too keen on PC minces (apart from tripe) and she is a living hoover.
I only use them for tripe now although I'm thinking about ordering Lucky's food from a supplier so I can get all the unusual stuff like lambs heads and trotters.
Well, you didn't dismiss it completely:I did ...."Sorry dont think I made my OP very clear...its not about raw feeding..."
Sorry dont think I made my OP very clear...its not about raw feeding...at least not just about raw feeding, I meant the meat in general, for either cooking or raw![]()
Ralphey has a bit of an upset tummy at the moment...when it clears up Ill seriously consider it![]()
Says Prize Choice and http://prizechoice.co.uk/Says who? Who has decided this meat is meant for the raw feeding market, when it clearly says on the pack for raw or cooked?
The fact that its small pieces of mince means youd clearly be able to see any bone that would be big enough to cause any problems...and Im sure they wouldnt say it can be cooked if it was going to be a big problem for dogs?
Yes, I have only ever bought the blocks of rabbit/chicken mince. They say rabbit on the pack but then when I got home found out its only 30% rabbit and 70% chicken. Only ever bought 3 packs and wasn't impressed.When you say very slodgy and watery are you talking about the blocks? Ive found them very watery...but the bags of chicken mince Ive found is not too bad