UK Pet Forums Forum banner
201 - 220 of 230 Posts
Discussion starter · #201 ·
And as for not training with fear ..... I beg to differ. At certain points (one being around the 13min mark) when he tells the dog very sternly "No" & "Leave it" the dogs clearly shows that he is worried. His ears go down & the lowered body posture, shows very clearly anxiety. If he had lowered his criteria & had the dog on a lead then he wouldn't have needed to act like that.
I went back to see if this was an older clip. I remember years ago watching him thinking he was really intimidating with his body language. Thought maybe this was an old clip from back then. But it's only 3 years ago and he hasn't changed or progressed much at all has he?

I think it just goes back to what we've been saying all along. ZG is a media specialist. He knows how to get likes and has definitely figured out the rage baiting, and it's working for him really well. I think it was a Canine Paradigm podcast where they explained how youtube, insta, FB, and tik tok are all monetized and it's based on how much time you spend on a certain clip. So any amount of time anyone spends commenting, ups the "attention" time on a clip and the paycheck for the creator.
His skill is in media, not in dogs.

Hats of to him though, he's figured out the formula to get people commenting and he's got to be making bank!
It just saddens me that none of this is helping dogs, helping their owners, or the industry in general.
 
Discussion starter · #202 ·
Speaking of helping dogs, this whole ME thing led me to this podcast featuring him. The host is annoying as all get-out, she interrupts him constantly, but... She is a total lay person. She owns and likes dogs but she's not a "dog person" in any way. Listening to him explaining dogs to her is really a thing of beauty!
This is just one gem I copied from the subtitles :)
A misconception about obedience, people look at obedience like “I’m going to tell you what to do and you’re going to do it because I said do it” right? As opposed to this is a collaboration that comes out of our entire relationship, and if the dog and I play together, and I find ways to motivate you, and I’m consistent and I provide good leadership, then the obedience portion of it sort of takes care of itself.”
And this podcast will reach a lot of non dog people. Which WILL help dogs.

 
I went back to see if this was an older clip. I remember years ago watching him thinking he was really intimidating with his body language. Thought maybe this was an old clip from back then. But it's only 3 years ago and he hasn't changed or progressed much at all has he?

I think it just goes back to what we've been saying all along. ZG is a media specialist. He knows how to get likes and has definitely figured out the rage baiting, and it's working for him really well. I think it was a Canine Paradigm podcast where they explained how youtube, insta, FB, and tik tok are all monetized and it's based on how much time you spend on a certain clip. So any amount of time anyone spends commenting, ups the "attention" time on a clip and the paycheck for the creator.
His skill is in media, not in dogs.

Hats of to him though, he's figured out the formula to get people commenting and he's got to be making bank!
It just saddens me that none of this is helping dogs, helping their owners, or the industry in general.
Yes, I also thought it might be an old clip so was very surprised to see it was only 3yrs ago. Does he not watch his clips & evaluate his training? I can't believe anyone would post this & think it was a good example of FF training. Especially as he is so vocal about others & constantly stresses he doesn't train with "fear & pain".

I know several really good FF trainers (for want of a better word) & their training is very considered & so much better than this, so this is not a criticism of FF training .... which tbh I actually don't think this is FF.

Definitely a case of a social media personality & commentator rather than an actual dog trainer.

I'll try to listen to the podcast you've posted in my break
 
I dont seek out ZG stuff, but the balanced trainers I follow love to post his stuff and shoot him down.

Has anybody seen the clip of ZG giving his pup a tap on the nose because he went to remove something from her, and she went to bite him?

He's said it himself when somebody called him out on the video of him grabbing and wrestling that dog, that it's the dog who determines what is aversive.
So, going by that, ecollars arent always aversive.
 
Discussion starter · #205 ·
Has anybody seen the clip of ZG giving his pup a tap on the nose because he went to remove something from her, and she went to bite him?
OMG no! Missed that one thank goodness!



He's said it himself when somebody called him out on the video of him grabbing and wrestling that dog, that it's the dog who determines what is aversive.
So, going by that, ecollars arent always aversive.
And going by that, body harnesses and head collars aren't always non aversive!
 
@Leanne77 NOOOO I HATE that my friend posted that clip on FB ! He's such a hypocrite it makes me so angry! ZG is all mouth and no actual ability, he doesn't seem to have any affinity with dogs at all!
 
Absolutely, Ritter's most hated bit of kit is his head collar.
I've said before that Roxy hated headcollars, no matter how much I tried to desensitize her to them (I had loads of different brands/styles to try). I actually think she would have preferred a prong collar, but my perceptions of them meant I wouldn't even try one .... I would now.

I think ZG rates himself alot more as a trainer than anyone else would. The fact that he does not use tools does not make him a good, effective or even considerate trainer, although am sure he thinks so.

His body language is really off in alot of his videos (I've now watched a few), his criteria is all over the place, his timing is poor, he has no idea how to motivate a dog, or how to play. He doesn't even appear comfortable around the dogs, even his own.
 
I'm very late to the party as I've hardly been on the forum these past few years, just dipping in and out. I'm planning to be around a bit more (partly because I'm getting little snippets of free time back and partly because I find Facebook such a depressing place to be a lot of the time) and I find this an interesting topic so might post my thoughts at some point. Right now I'm impressed with myself that I've managed to read through all 11 pages today without going cross-eyed :LOL:

For now though I'd just like to say that I absolutely hate the term "force free". I've never liked it and would never use it to describe the way I train. I don't see how one can possibly be force free. I force my dogs to do stuff all the time. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't chose to go to some of the places I take them to, and of course there is force every time they hit the end of the lead, just as a few examples. I don't like "purely positive" either. Neither term really makes any sense to me.

If someone asks how I train I usually say that I'm a reward-based trainer. I focus on teaching dogs the behaviours that I want to see more of and heavily rewarding those. And if a dog is doing something I don't want then I try to ensure that they aren't going to get reinforcement from it. I want a two-way communication to happen between me and my dogs, I want to be their safety and their leader. I want them to know that I will respond to what they are feeling and that they can trust me to help them out when they are struggling. It's basically the same as the relationship I strive for with my children.
 
Thought I'd finally post my musings on this thread, having read all 11 pages. Sorry in advance if it's not very coherent and doesn't flow very well - it's an amalgamation of things that are whizzing around my head from the various discussion points on here.

First off, I will say I have not listened to the podcast in question so cannot comment on that. This is just my general thoughts on things that have been brought up on my thread. I'm not a fan of ZG. I have nothing against him per se, but I don't follow him and he's not a trainer that I find particularly inspirational. I know nothing about IB really so won't comment on him either.

As I said above, I hate the term "force free". It's not a term I would ever use as to me it is inaccurate. Also, I prefer to say how I DO train rather than how I DON'T train.

I think someone mentioned something about allowing dogs to tell other dogs off for things. I do this providing I am confident that it is unlikely to escalate. Holly is a great example (sorry, I know I think the sun shines out of her backside) of a dog who is really good at putting rude dogs in their place without taking it too far. She's like the strict headmistress - you cross her once and you won't do it again! Ruby quickly learned not to get on the wrong side of her (yet she will continually wind up other dogs given the chance). Yet Holly can be very forgiving and tolerant of a lot of things. Ruby knows what she can get away with and what she absolutely cannot, as Holly has set very clear boundaries. I have also found that Holly is a great diffuser in awkward situations. There's a Labrador that I walk, and I used to take her out with Ruby to a secure field. They are a similar age, and got on well. Only, I found that the Labrador started getting a bit bolshy with Ruby, jumping on her and generally being a PITA. Ruby did very little to stop it, but it was clear that she didn't like it. I'd call the Labrador away and re-direct her, which was fine but it became quite intense. My business partner suggested taking Holly with me as well, so I did. It completely changed the dynamic. The Labrador tried that nonsense on Holly and Holly very quickly made it clear that her behaviour was unacceptable. Just one stern word from Holly was enough, and the Labrador never tried anything like it with Holly again. It also changed how she was with Ruby, and if the Labrador starts getting a bit bolshy with Ruby then Holly will just trot past between them and it diffuses the situation. The dynamic between the 3 of them is so interesting to watch. The Labrador is extremely respectful towards Holly. She doesn't appear to be scared of her, but she is very respectful.
I know that there will be some that disagree with me doing this, but I made a judgement based on what I know about the dogs in question, and I feel that it worked out well.

My Facebook account got hacked a while back and I couldn't access Facebook for a few weeks. In all honesty, were it not for the fact that I needed it for my business then I probably wouldn't have been that bothered. The amount of bitching on Facebook between dog trainers is horrendous - I'm honestly sick to death of it. It reminds me of a school playground at times.

I have to say that I find it incredibly depressing when my Facebook feed is full of posts for trainers criticising other trainers and their methods. A few months ago I saw one from a trainer, not someone that I follow, who had just had a session with a previous client of mine. Whilst she didn't mention my name or business name, she felt the need to criticise my methods, which she was also incorrect about. She basically said that the client had been told to "avoid and distract" with her reactive dog and then went on to say why this was flawed and ridiculous. Well I don't ask my clients to "avoid and distract". There had been no avoidance, in fact on at least two of the sessions we had done parallel walking with Holly, so I'm not sure how that constitutes avoiding. And "distract" shows a clear lack of understanding of what counter-conditioning is. For the record, I do think there are sometimes situations where you need to distract the dog, but this would generally be when faced with an unexpected situation that you just need to get the dog through, not for general behaviour modification. Now I know she can only go on the information given to her by the client, but if there's one thing I've learned it's that you can't always take things that you're told at face value. Sometimes clients misinterpret things, and whilst it is important to note that part of being a good trainer is making sure that your client understands what they are doing and why, it doesn't mean that it needs to become a bitchfest on Facebook if things don't work out for whatever reason. I was absolutely seething when I read the post, and then watched the video of her "behaviour modification" where the dog in question harasses one of her pugs who looks mightily uncomfortable with the situation. Well sorry if I wasn't about to let my 8 year old arthritic dog be pounced on by a rude large male dog (muzzled or otherwise), who I knew was likely to jump on her and try to intimidate her given his history in the name of behaviour modification - she means too much to me for that.
And yes, that sounds like a contradiction to what I mentioned above with the Labrador, but the situations are very different. Firstly, the Labrador is quite a bit smaller than Holly, and secondly I know the Labrador very well. I knew that a quick telling off from Holly would stop anything else from happening, whereas with the male dog mentioned I did not feel the same.

I do think it's important to have discussions, and yes sometimes these can turn heated, and it's important to evaluate and re-evaluate our methods to try to do the best by the client and dog. But I don't think there's ever a place for outright bitching and criticising other trainers. We've had loads of dogs come to us after seeing other trainers and not once have I felt the need to take to social media and criticise the trainer in question. I do not use devices such as ecollars, prongs or slip leads in my training, but I do think it's useful to understand how others might use these to train. I have attended some webinars by "balanced" trainers because I want to understand how they train. I can take the stuff that I like and use that, and leave behind anything that doesn't match my own ethics.

I will get off my soapbox now and watch some Call the Midwife for some escapism!
 
Discussion starter · #213 ·
I love your take @Sairy !

Your example about using Holly with the labrador is wonderful, and yes, the sun does shine out Holly's backside LOL!
Having a stable, mature dog who can teach the other dog a lesson in one or two reps where it would take us humans 20 and not even that successfully! I've had a couple dogs like that and it's invaluable.
And yes, of course there is nuance, with the trainer letting her dog get accosted, it's not the same thing at all, the dogs don't have a relationship, and her dog was uncomfortable and unsure how to handle it. You have to know when it's appropriate and when to approach it differently.

I have to chuckle sometimes at what the owner hears vs. what the trainer said. I've witnessed several of those myself. As a coach to youngsters I have adopted the phrase "now tell me what you heard me say" and the responses I get can range from head-scratchers to hilarious. It has helped me become more clear in my instructions, but also is a great insight into what kids are really feeling.

Enjoyed reading your post, really glad to have you back!
 
I love your take @Sairy !

Your example about using Holly with the labrador is wonderful, and yes, the sun does shine out Holly's backside LOL!
Having a stable, mature dog who can teach the other dog a lesson in one or two reps where it would take us humans 20 and not even that successfully! I've had a couple dogs like that and it's invaluable.
And yes, of course there is nuance, with the trainer letting her dog get accosted, it's not the same thing at all, the dogs don't have a relationship, and her dog was uncomfortable and unsure how to handle it. You have to know when it's appropriate and when to approach it differently.

I have to chuckle sometimes at what the owner hears vs. what the trainer said. I've witnessed several of those myself. As a coach to youngsters I have adopted the phrase "now tell me what you heard me say" and the responses I get can range from head-scratchers to hilarious. It has helped me become more clear in my instructions, but also is a great insight into what kids are really feeling.

Enjoyed reading your post, really glad to have you back!
Yes we've had some head-scratching moments in class where we think we've explained an exercise well, but when we tell our 6 dog and handler teams to have a go we get 6 different versions of the exercise 😂
It's all a learning curve!

And how many times do I have to tell people to keep their hands off their treats until they've marked their dogs?😂

"The lead is a safety belt, not a steering wheel" is another one of my favourite phrases.
 
I love your take @Sairy !

Your example about using Holly with the labrador is wonderful, and yes, the sun does shine out Holly's backside LOL!
Having a stable, mature dog who can teach the other dog a lesson in one or two reps where it would take us humans 20 and not even that successfully! I've had a couple dogs like that and it's invaluable.
And yes, of course there is nuance, with the trainer letting her dog get accosted, it's not the same thing at all, the dogs don't have a relationship, and her dog was uncomfortable and unsure how to handle it. You have to know when it's appropriate and when to approach it differently.

I have to chuckle sometimes at what the owner hears vs. what the trainer said. I've witnessed several of those myself. As a coach to youngsters I have adopted the phrase "now tell me what you heard me say" and the responses I get can range from head-scratchers to hilarious. It has helped me become more clear in my instructions, but also is a great insight into what kids are really feeling.

Enjoyed reading your post, really glad to have you back!
Duplicate post
 
Discussion starter · #217 ·
Well he's back at it. Now Zak George is attacking a trainer I found through the Denise Fenzi drama. SailorJerry (or Jerri) dog trainer. I initially started following her after her wildwest stories which I found hilarious and just silly entertainment. She's a lovely dog trainer too. Anyway, somehow ZG is accusing her of being a shock jock, racist, supporting "systems of oppression" and a few other things and it's all blown up over social media.

I don't know why I care about any of this, I don't know what I hope to accomplish posting on here about it, whether I want others to join in the outrage over how he's treating people, or tell me to get off line and out on the paddleboard. (It's too hot, but I do have a good book going.)

Why are we like this? What does all this infighting look like from the outside? Do we dog people look as crazy as Best in Show but not a fun way? Are we putting people off training dogs? How did decolonization become part of dog training?
And most importantly, is there any solution to all of this?
 
I like her stuff, I follow her on IG because of Denise Fenzi.

I haven't seen any of ZG's content for ages now as it's pointless looking at it & getting drawn into the madness. I do laugh when someone posts a screenshot of his crazy sh*t tho.

The hysteria from some of these people is actually quite amusing, they are like characters from a Chris Morris show (bit of a vague reference & not sure if anyone watched Brass Eye back in the day!).

These cracks pots shout about all the 'isms'; ableism, colonialism, racism ..... it's exhausting reading that sort of BS. It's bloody dog trainng, just get on with it!

I just don't have the time or energy anymore, these people have their own agendas & it's not about the welfare of dogs at all, but all about self promotion.
 
Discussion starter · #219 ·
it's not about the welfare of dogs at all, but all about self promotion.
100%
Not just self-promotion, but $$$$$
There is something about the amount of time people spend on your post that can boost monetization. I wouldn't know for sure because I have 234 followers 😂 😂 But apparently, for monetization purposes, it has nothing to do with likes or followers, but how long people spend looking at your post. And for those purposes, any time you spend commenting on a post also counts. So the more the likes of ZG can get people to comment on his posts, the more money he makes. He has figured out the rage baiting thing for sure! Hell, I fall for it!! But it's also really sad that he has to bring people down in order to do it.

In better news, I spent the morning making a delicious veggie lasagna, and listened to Denise Fenzi's latest live about how her 3 dogs reacted differently to the stock fencing on her farm. Nothing earth shattering, but lovely how she articulated what most of us already know about how dogs might react to being surprised with a zap.
It did get me thinking though how often those who are adamantly for or against ecollars, the ones who don't allow for any grey areas or nuance, also tend to be people who work with mainly one "type" of dog - which, you guessed it, is the type to do well or not well at all with that kind of training.
 
That's makes so much sense .... it's always about the money!!!

I think creating so much division & stirring people up is far too common now. I honestly can't be dealing with it anymore.

Too many people online are so angry now, so full of their own importance, so convinced they are right & anyone who disagrees is the enemy & so hateful. It's so depressing.

ZG embodies everything that's wrong with some people, so wrapped up in themselves & being a sort of saviour .... in his eyes anyway :rolleyes:

I need to listen to a bit more of Denise F's stuff tho, I just haven't had time. I really like her content & she's just so considerate of both dogs & their humans. Although according to another FF zealot, DF is ableist, racist & a colonialist 🤣🤣🤣
 
201 - 220 of 230 Posts