If you are the only at there of your breed, colour and divison does that mean you will automatically gets 1st and not have it w/h and be 2nd if your cat weren't good enough?
I completely agree, but there is alot of GCCF bashing at present (not necessarily from here!) by people who are disgruntled with them for one reason or another and have decided to swap to a different registry. All of a sudden, despite having had showed GCCF for years and been happy with everything, suddenly the GCCF man handle the cats, is too political (that applies to every registry once you get used to it), awards only given to judges friends, shows are unfriendly blah blah blah and suddenly because they have moved everyone else should because TICA is so much better and so much friendlier and the titles so much harder to obtain, and anyone who shows GCCF doesn't care about their cat. Believe me I have seen those sentiments expressed in more than one place.so itfrustrates me that people are happy to slag off another registry because the format is different.
:thumbup: great postJust to play devils advocate here, as I do not think overall that either registry is blanket easier or harder, there are swings and roundabouts on both sides, but seeing as the gist of some of the posts on this are that is definitely harder to gain a top title under TICA than the GCCF (remembering I am playing devils advocate before you aim your AK47s in my direction)
- In the eyes of the rest of the TICA world as the UK still on isolated status meaning they only have to gain half the number of points than that of our European/US counterparts, doesnÂ’t that make it easier for TICA UK to ultimately gain titles ?
- If TICA exhibitors feel their titles are more hard fought, why don’t they prefix their titles with (TICA) ? I have seen lists of TICA supremes nestled up against GCCF supremes – on the face of it same title Supreme Grand Champion, but if cat count is everything, realistically which is the harder fought, the cat who has won a ring out of 90 cats ( and it doesn’t have to be that number) in one judges opinion or the cat that has been declared best cat in a count of 1200 – 1300 having had to impress 5 different judges on the same day. Listing all those together for those TICA exhibitors who have only just migrated and were previously GCCF isn’t there the tiniest possibility of trying to claim a little of the GCCFs Supreme winners kudos
?
- Just taking the lower titles, a cat can make Ch fairly easily only having to impress 2 different judges, GCCF Ch has to impress 3 different judges. No easy wins if you are the only one in class either with a w/h ability.
- Very hard to do but you can make GCCF Imperial in a minimum of 11 shows, but you would have had to impress a minimum of 5 different judges (in reality far more than that) to attain that award. Technically you can get way with only having to impress 2? (or maybe 4) judges to get your TICA supreme. My understanding is that you can supreme by winning a SP ring, doesnÂ’t have to be an AB ring so the cat count is potentially drastically reduced.
Just as another observation, realistically if a judge has 90 cats to see for one ring – how much notice of each cat can they humanly take in and remember? Or are TICA judges more super human than GCCF judges – JOKE!!!!
Soon possibly changingI've never knocked anyones tica titles. My opinion on the whole tica thing is that I prefer how titles are achieved at the GCCF and I don't think there is anything wrong with that :smile:
In the eyes of the rest of the TICA world as the UK still on isolated status meaning they only have to gain half the number of points than that of our European/US counterparts, doesnÂ’t that make it easier for TICA UK to ultimately gain titles ?
(never knew that!)
I have bred winners of both, and am very proud of both, but I know for sure which was won by the better cat and which one was harder fought.I know I am much prouder of my Supreme title with Tica than I would be with an Imperial