To demand that she is sterilised would cause outcry, to forceibly do it would go against her human rights. I notice the paper haven't actually gone into great detail explaining what she's actually guilty of ? Yet she's being treated worse than a criminal.
I've never actually dealt with social services on a personal level regarding my own children - but had dealings with them when I was a child, they do actually make me want to scream, there is no proof that this woman has actually do anything wrong - the article just explains social services feel she has
lack of parenting ability yet how do they know for sure when they haven't actually let her keep a single one of her babies ? Social services are not supposed to forcibly take your children inless there is
evidence without a doubt that there is something actually going on but time and time again they lie through their teeth and twist words around to their advantage, they've even been known to take children away from their parents just because the parent has a low IQ - How wrong is that ? Anyone actually seen the movie "I am Sam" so I'd like to know really what they found when carrying out all their assessments, how can they even begin to assess situation when the children are not present as they've already been taken away.
There is such a thing as forced adoption to make government targets look good

look it up, you will find many articles!.
Social workers have been known time and time again to get things wrong and lie through their teeth to get what they want, after all it's easier to get a baby adopted out than it is for instance a child on 8-9 after all they
may come with loads of baggage!
