You don’t need to reply Frank 🙄

 

What is this feature Tony? Where is it?

 

If there’s 240 odd reading the good morning thread, I own a team of huskies 🙄

 

It does make the new posts page more cluttered doesn't it?

 

Is that showing up when you go to the what's new page? I can't see it on my phone.
Edited to add: I can see it but only on a few threads

 

Does it show if 'no-one' is reading a thread?

 

Strikes me as pointless. I read what I want to read going by the title. I don't need it to be turned into a popularity contest Bah humbug!

 

It's just another gimmick from Vertical Scope. At least its less annoying than the AI.

 

Trying to appear more like a social media app I guess? 🙄

 

This is a feature that used to exist - many members were sad to see it go when it was removed - we decided to bring it back to see what users thought.

What don't you like about it?

- Christian

 

What don't you like about it?

Unnecessary.
Adds nothing.
Clutters up small screens.

 

I don't remember oblong boxes with a green spot in them. Don't you think it is a bit too prominent as if it were important? It certainly isn't to me because I don't remember anything similar in the last 11+ years.

 

I joined in 2012 and don't recall seeing it either. Maybe I'm just not too observant. I tend to stick to the same few things.

 

Yeah, that's ANNOYING. And pointless, because as you say, it is just bots. Apparently the owners are pulling out all the stops to "revive" this forum.

The main problem I suspect is the ads. I use an ad block but still get ads. Imagine a new person coming in and trying to make a post and being constantly blocked by ads. Who would come back after that? They are going to do this forum in, just on the ads.

 

I've been here for a long while and I don't remember this being a feature at all.

 

Who's online used to be a feature, but there was never a who's reading feature that I remember and I've been here a long time too.

 

I've been a PF member for over 10 years and never seen this reading number whatsit before.

Oh and could you do us a favour by asking Frank whats his name to reply to the threads in intelligible English ...... we're mainly British on the forum and I for one don't take kindly to being American-ised!

Being essentially British IMO has been one of the main strengths of of this forum and now you're ruining it by trying to put it into one characterless "melting pot".

 

I don't give a damn how many people are reading a post. It doesn't mean anything.

 

It's not people, it's bots. If you click on the "who's online" it's a lot of bots...

 

@vsadmin still waiting for your reply to post #28 from @Summercat

 

Yes. And since you asked and we've told you what we think, can you please remove this "feature"?

 

Actually it's worse than useless - it makes it hard to spot which threads I'm 'following' e.g. which I've replied to.

 

@vsadmin ???

 

If it was so many years ago, are any of those active still around? I haven't seen any posts in favour from those very longstanding members.

 

@lorilu has been a PF member since 2009 and as far as I'm aware she doesn't remember it being a feature. As @Calvine says the PF owners should have the records and history going back to day one, and be able to give us dates and details.

 

I've been a member since 2008 and a mod since about 2010 and I have never seen this feature before nor anyone complaining that it had been removed.

 

I'm an hour ahead of the UK and I find it difficult to believe 102 people were reading the Good Morning Thread at what in the UK was 6.30 on a Saturday morning! Totally out of proportion to all the other threads which counted together only amounted to half a dozen people.

 

@TonyG. You really started something with this thread! 😀😀

 

Too bad we aren't getting anywhere. The bot count is still there, still misleading. The powers that be are ignoring us, in spite of claiming they want our opinions.

I had a boss like that lol. She loved pretending she was all open minded and would have these stupid unscheduled meetings to tell us what she was planning and to ask our opinions. We all soon learned that she'd already made her decision and if you voiced an opinion it was just an opportunity for her to shoot down the one who spoke up. She thought it made her look good and fair.

Oh well, off topic, but you can see my point. They don't really care what we, the members, think or want. They just pretend they do because it looks good.

 

Or maybe I’m another robot @QOTN

 

And you never mentioned it to me all these past years? Even this wretched AI couldn't penetrate your disguise?

 

@Summercat. It is looking doubtful that you will get a straight reply to your straightforward question in post #28.

 

Tagging @vsadmin so they see, and can respond to the posts above.

 

You'll wait a long time for any meaningful response @JoanneF

 

Forever? And a day?

 

To be fair, I suppose its hard to defend the indefensible ...

 

Quite honestly, I don't much care if this 'feature' exists or not.
But I can't work out why in post #16 Christian says it used to exist if it didn't, and mighty odd that not one person can remember it - (I'd expect and hope with a name like Christian he would be telling the truth).
He also said they were 'bringing it back to see what we thought'. Well, people have made it clear what they think, so what are they planning to do with it?