owner should be responsible for their animals 100% of the time.
I agree. But being responsible for cats shouldn't mean being
in control of cats. Unless we're all to be obliged to keep them indoors 24/7, which is unlikely.
I think Marycat's central point is important. There are laws controlling dogs (and horses) because they are fully domesticated and trainable animals who obey us and work for us and that we can and should be expected to control. Cats are different. But despite the cat's independence and autonomy, owners or keepers of cats should always be prepared to make restitution for their moggies' misdemeanours where necessary. That's just part of the responsibility of having a cat.
Do any insurance companies offer third party insurance for damage caused by cats? Is it even an issue? Do cats ever cause significant damage, or is it just that they poo in the flowerbed without understanding who the flowerbed belongs to?
Cat owners should have the understanding of their neighbours. We should all try to understand one another. I mean if my neighbour expects me to deny my cat his need to roam by confining him 24/7, I might justifiably expect him to muzzle his dog at all times and never to let it run off the leash. Seems fair, no?
Or we could just cut each other a little slack and decide there are more important things in life to worry about.
