UK Pet Forums Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
21 - 40 of 91 Posts
Yeah, no matter where someone stands politically, celebrating a death just feels wrong. It’s a tragedy for his family and loved ones. I’ve noticed on Meta platforms especially, people can get really toxic about this kind of news. We need more empathy, even when we disagree strongly.
 
Discussion starter · #22 ·
The FBI has released a statement saying the killer had a transgender partner.

Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin lived with his transgender partner, senior-level FBI officials told Fox News Digital.

Bureau officials confirmed that Tyler Robinson, 22, was in a "romantic relationship" with the unnamed person, who is a male transitioning to a female, and that they shared an apartment in Saint George, Utah. Those FBI officials told Fox News Digital that Robinson's partner is fully cooperating with the FBI's investigation.
 
The FBI has released a statement saying the killer had a transgender partner.

Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin lived with his transgender partner, senior-level FBI officials told Fox News Digital.

Bureau officials confirmed that Tyler Robinson, 22, was in a "romantic relationship" with the unnamed person, who is a male transitioning to a female, and that they shared an apartment in Saint George, Utah. Those FBI officials told Fox News Digital that Robinson's partner is fully cooperating with the FBI's investigation.
Wow, that's news. I read that after the shooting he went back to his parents' house for dinner and father talked him into going to the police (and drove him there). No mention of a trans partner being there. Trump makes it clear he has no time for trans people and banned them from competing against biological females in sport; Kirk would surely have held similar views.
The plot thickens.
 
Discussion starter · #24 · (Edited)
Trump's speech about the death was the words of a tyrant who just wants revenge.
Tyrant
Unsurprisingly, that other far-right meathead, Tommy Robinson, is using the killing of Kirk to mobilise support before what is expected to be Britain’s largest far-right rally in decades, which will include speakers from Britain, the US and Europe.

Be afraid. We have turned into 1930s Eastern Europe.
It is the far left celebrating Charlie's death . I asked in another post how would Meathead use Charlie's murder to mobilise support when it's white killing white although the Nazis did gas the Polish and disabled people.😥 Did mention him? I never saw anything
On line about this.
Was the rally called Unite Britain or something ? Thousands turned and judging by the photos , there were families and all races.
 
Save
It is the far left celebrating Charlie's death . I asked in another post how would Meathead use Charlie's murder to mobilise support when it's white killing white although the Nazis did gas the Polish and disabled people.😥 Did mention him? I never saw anything
On line about this.
Want the rally called Unite Britain or something ? Thousands turned and judging by the photos , there were families and all races.
Most of the people the Nazis killed were Jews. They also killed Eastern Slavs, Soviet POWs, Homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, Freemasons and several other groups.
 
Discussion starter · #26 · (Edited)
Most of the people the Nazis killed were Jews. They also killed Eastern Slavs, Soviet POWs, Homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, Freemasons and several other groups.
Yes I do know that , 6 million. 😭 Jews are a pure race , I suppose I see British white people as a mixture of Anglo saxons , vikings , the French . We've are not ancient Britons anymore .
 
Save
It is the far left celebrating Charlie's death . I asked in another post how would Meathead use Charlie's murder to mobilise support when it's white killing white although the Nazis did gas the Polish and disabled people.😥 Did mention him? I never saw anything
On line about this.
Was the rally called Unite Britain or something ? Thousands turned and judging by the photos , there were families and all races.
There was also a counter-protest. According to reports, Meathead Robinson's lot was mostly white. And violent.
It's likely the counter-protest was made up of families of all ethnicities.

Yes I do know that , 6 million. 😭 Jews are a pure race , I suppose I see British white people as a mixture of Anglo saxons , vikings , the French . We've are not ancient Britons anymore .
White British is technically anyone who is white and born here. Homosapiens first evolved in Africa, and every person alive today can trace their genetic ancestry to there. Scientists reckon there are 15 to 20 different species of early humans. There was a trial conducted, and it found that most people on the planet have some Viking DNA in them. In fact, scientists now, when looking at DNA and fossils, etc; say that we have such a diverse mix of ancestry. Yes, "White British" in the traditional thinking contains a lot of Viking, Anglo-Saxon, etc, but that is a pattern spread out around the world.

But, sorry, that's me going off on a tangent, as I find it interesting!! :)


edit: I add to write homosapien again as it was bleeped out!!

I don't know what you mean by Jews being a pure race, either.

It is the far left celebrating Charlie's death .
I'm very leftist and not celebrating. I follow a lot of people on YouTube who have similar political views and are not celebrating, either. We do not mourn him, either. I accept some are, but certainly people I know aren't.
 
Save
There are Ashkenazi, Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews depending which part of the world they originated from. Not only are there some genetic differences between them but also cultural, linguistic and culininary differences.

I don't claim to be knowledgeable, but people also convert. I know Jewish people who have married outside the faith (if that is the right terminology, apologise if it isn't), but are bringing their children up to appreciate both sides of the culture and faith.
 
Save
I don't claim to be knowledgeable, but people also convert. I know Jewish people who have married outside the faith (if that is the right terminology, apologise if it isn't), but are bringing their children up to appreciate both sides of the culture and faith.
Technically it travels down the maternal line.
A number of generations back one of my relatives married a non Jewish woman so their children weren’t Jewish and so on.
 
It is the far left celebrating Charlie's death
It is not the far left celebrating Kirks Death.

it does to be moronic individuals, who clearly do to of never felt grief or lost anyone close to them, nor felt any kind of compassion or to have any social clue as to the correct way humans should to behave into such a situation.

only cretins do to celebrate the murder of others

The 'Far left" do to not be a party or an institution. They do to not have a HR department. They do to not of put out a joint statement telling all their followers that celebrating Kirks death does to be the official line.
That distinction does to be extremely important to make dont you think?

It does to be a minority of indivuduals with certain and varied political leanings.
And not exclusive to the far left.
There are individuals of the far right that do to also be celebrating because they did view Kirk as a traitor to the cause.
And individuals who are neither, but do to vociferously dislike who and what he was.

I do to be willing to bet anyone here can take an honest look at their social media and to admit anyone they do to know celebrating this does to be the minority and not the majority.
I do to be willing to bet further that the vast majority of people here do have to of gone looking for such attitudes into the first place, having first been given information by third parties.
And if you do to of seen none, then it is even more reason to not repeat stuff you do to see online automatically.

Can we to please get away from all of this peddled propaganda that is constantly swallowed and respouted as verbatim.

Yet again those who can do to be pitting one side against another, pouring petrol onto a fire, hoping to entrench people and cause further division to further their own goals.

It does to not be celebrating someones death to point out the crass comments that person did to make onto a continual basis.
It does to not be celebrating someones death to have no empathy or state you do to have apathy towards the death of a man who did to be a divisive figure. He did to be a complete stranger to 99.9% of the planet.

This does to be being warped out of all sense of normality to remove the rights of others. People do to be losing their jobs and being put onto hitlists for not showing the correct level of sorrow other people do to be demanding of them.

It is within everyones freedoms to mourn or celebrate who they do want.
You do to either be for that right, or against it. You do not get to pick and choose when it is applied and who to.
 
Technically it travels down the maternal line.
A number of generations back one of my relatives married a non Jewish woman so their children weren’t Jewish and so on.
There are quite a few reasons, both physical (the child is carried by the mother and given birth by her so (supposedly) will be more likely to inherit the spiritual traits from her necessary to be Jewish).
However, having worked with two Jewish people, the reason both gave was somewhat more prosaic and gave the reason as:"You know who your mother is, but your father may not be who you think he is."
Not that this has anything to do with the thread - sorry, @kimthecat!
 
For anyone who may not have heard:
Recent politically motivated killings in Minnesota in June :


Kirks gig was profiting from dividing people and marginalizing certain groups.
His wife appears to want to continue his mission.

Here is a quote from Kirk:

"I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational."
 
Thats the thing. His own comments in the past have given people free rein to be less than sympathetic.

Obviously violence is never an answer and its terrible for all involved....but its also weird knowing that if it was anybody else he probably would of seen them as an acceptable loss.
 
Discussion starter · #37 ·
The 'Far left" do to not be a party or an institution. They do to not have a HR department. They do to not of put out a joint statement telling all their followers that celebrating Kirks death does to be the official line.
That distinction does to be extremely important to make dont you think?
Nor is the "Far right"
 
Discussion starter · #38 ·
It is within everyones freedoms to mourn or celebrate who they do want.
You do to either be for that right, or against it. You do not get to pick and choose when it is applied and who to.
I see your point, I did cheer when the terrorist behind 9/11 was killed. However , we can pick and choose in a way , we can vote people out of power or boycott , demonstrate etc .
 
Save
Nor is the "Far right"
I did to not say they were.
However they do to be significantly more organised, to have formed into specific groupsthat do to have such formats and to have significantly more publicity than anything onto the left.
Can you to name a far right faction, what they do want and the person that does lead that faction off the top of your head? How many can you list?

Can you to do the same for the far left?!
Just as dangerous, yet it does to be like trying to nail soup to a wall to actually define anything far left.

I see your point, I did cheer when the terrorist behind 9/11 was killed. However , we can pick and choose in a way , we can vote people out of power or boycott , demonstrate etc .
Freedom of expression and freedom of speech does to not mean anyone has to listen to you, to have to like what you say or to like what you stand for.
When you do to vote someone out of power you do to not be removing that persons rights. You do to be empowering your own.
When you do to boycott someone or something, or demostrate, you do to be exercising your rights, not oppressing the rights of others.

Rights do to belong to all.
Or they do to belong to none.
They do to not be switched on and off like a light.

So beware the snakes that do tell you they will remove only the rights of certain people and would to not dare touch yours. Once theirs go, yours go.
You do want rights for all, or no rights for yourself. There is no in between.
They do start with the weakest into society and work their way up as the dominoes fall.
 
Discussion starter · #40 · (Edited)
Trump is coming next week . Lots of extra protection. Really felt for him when they showed the photo of him and Melania looking so sad , it was his colleague and he must have thought of his own near miss.
 
21 - 40 of 91 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.