Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbo_28_02
they really need to change it as it is not breed specific...
|
the DDA
is 'breed specific'.
it lists 4 'breeds', one of which is actually not even a breed but a TYPE.
Ur dog does not have to be registered as a purebred American Staffordshire Terrier AKA AmStaff,
nor a registered purebred American Pit-Bull Terrier AKA "A.P.B.T."
Ur dog just has to
resemble an AmStaff / APBT to be taken as 'dangerous', despite any
history of being a perfectly nice, friendly dog who has never bitten anybody.
the dog can be a Boxer-mix, Staffy-mix, Bull Terrier-mix, or any of over 2-dozen breeds or mixes.
it doesn't matter;
behavior doesn't matter, the dog can be a saint who rescues drowning children
from the surf, in between guiding blind people across busy streets & doing tricks to make kids in the hospital
smile & laugh -
it doesn't matter.
what matters is WHAT THE DOG LOOKS LIKE. The 'Act' is quite specific: if s/he looks like a Tosa, Fila or pit-type,
the dog is doomed - and automatically 'dangerous'.
any dog can bite; there are specific things that make a dog more likely to bite.
being intact [vs desexed].
lack of socialization.
being chained outside; living outdoors [vs in the home].
lack of any training.
the most-likely profile for a dog who bites* in the USA?
- intact
- male
- approx 2-YO
- lives in a fenced yard or on a chain.
* bites = a serious injury needing medical attention, not simple first aid.
the 32-YO California woman who was killed by her dog, at home?
one neighbor who also had dogs, whose yard adjoined hers, had seen her 2 dogs.
other neighbors
did not even know she HAD dogs. so they were never walked around
the neighborhood - or at least, never during hours when the nearby residents would have seen them,
& it hardly seems likely she'd be walking them at 2-AM.