![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| General Chat Chat to other forum members about any topics you wish which are not related to pets. |
| Registered users don't see this ad - Register Now (It's free!) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
And for some (if we wanna talk politics) can remeber what it was like under the Tories. Closing down of good British Industries - Shipping, Car manufacturing, Mining, Steel etc etc. So may be the labour government are EU because that is where we need to be to trade our somewhat diminished manufacturing industry. Hence keeping people in jobs. ARGHHHHHH dont make me start |
| Registered users don't see this ad - Register Now (It's free!) |
|
|||
|
Re: Pet License
Quote:
![]() |
|
||||
|
Re: Pet License
Quote:
__________________
If I havn't replied to a post, please PM me, my memory is like a seive sometimes.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Pet License
i think this maybe going off the track.leave the politics out.we all have our own thoughts on that.gosh i can remember when you would'nt tell nyone who you voted for...now i know why.
![]() |
|
|||
|
Re: Pet License
Quote:
IF licenences WERE introduced I purely believe it would be because the Govornment were forced into it by people shouting too loudly, remember the DDA? A knee jerk reaction that was responsible for the outright banning of four breeds in the UK? How exactly did that come about? The Govornment, doing things in haste without thinking how they were going to enforce it, classic example of another one of their ideas that didn't work. Pit Bulls are still owned in the UK and people STILL breed them for fighting, how are these people going to be effected by a licence ? Simple answer is they won't, they all work underground anyway! So, for the reasons stated above I have a very bad feeling IF licences were introduced, they would be breed specific... Be careful what you wish for... |
|
||||
|
Re: Pet License
Quote:
Bulldogs, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, Rotties & recently Akita's are all dogs commonly purchased by people literally buying them for aesthetic reasons, not because they love the animal but because they love the fact that the dog gives them status (or at least they think it does). And they never get the dog trained and don't really know how to look after it> which makes it more likely that the dog will attack someone. This will give the dog a bad reputation. But don't you think the license might help to stamp out this kind of buying, therefore improving the reputation of the mentionedd dogs?
__________________
If I havn't replied to a post, please PM me, my memory is like a seive sometimes.
|
|
|||
|
Re: Pet License
Quote:
The above breeds are usually purchased on a whim, by people who have little or no understanding of them, please don't make the mistake of tarring us all with the same brush I think you took my 'reputation' thing completely out of context. Yes, I understand these breeds have a bad reputation but there are other ways of 'fixing' these problems without having to go down the licensing route. One of my dogs is a registered PAT dog, not a breed of dog that has a bad reputation as such, but one you really wouldn't expect to be a PAT dog a really GOOD way of showing your dogs in a positive light. Maybe all dogs should be registered as PAT dogs? I understand cats can be too ![]() Welcome to Pets As Therapy |
|
||||
|
Re: Pet License
Quote:
![]() I just said most people that buy them are, which i think is a fair thing to say. Unfortunate as it is, i think it's true.
__________________
If I havn't replied to a post, please PM me, my memory is like a seive sometimes.
Last edited by tashi; 18-06-2008 at 02:15 PM. Reason: derogatory comments |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Sponsored Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|