Quote:
Originally Posted by Becki&Daisy
Heya quite new to the forum.
Have read on several threads now what a bad food bakers and pedigree is!
Daisy is 7 months old so is on a mixture of both the wet and dry puppy foods of these brands!
It was a bit of a battle trying to find food she likes as she grazes and then when she wants to she'll eat it all.
I personally am quite happy feeding her on this. She likes it and has no health problems teeth are good coat is good.
Just wondering why everyone thinks it is so bad. And what they would suggest (i may not change...) and why? 
|
All my dogs were on Royal Cannine, and went off it big time. I went to visit my mate who had her dogs on Bakers, and my dog all went up to the bowl and ate it all between them. So I thought I would put mine on it. Then after 1 year of being on it, (no problems). I came on here and there was a big thread going on about Bakers and Pedigree Chum, so I said my peice about it, and everyone else said theirs.......there was alot of contraversial talks about it. 10 weeks ago I decided to put mine back onto another food, so I got James Wellbeloved which the older dogs like. But I have Royal Cannine for the Chiuahua's, who dont eat a large amount anyway, and Royal Cannine is always on Special offer. They all have a pick of each one anyway, but each one prefers their own, and I did what two other ladies in the shop did, buy one bag of each as each one is always on a special offer in the shop so I will buy which ever one is on offer now. This woman is a qualified breeder and told me this is what she does and it work 100% for her so I thought I would go ahead and go for it.
Bakers is cheap and have alot of additives and not alot of meat content. MAINLY FILLERS AND CRAP AND ADDITIVES FOR THE COLOURING. The tins of Chum and cheaper tins are FULL of fat 40% some of them and alot of fillers. Now even though you are payiing cheapers for a bigger bag of BAKERS, your dog will actually eat more of the Bakers and Chum as it isnt filling them up enough and they feel hungry quicker, you will go through a 2KG bag of James Wellbeloved to the 3KG of Bakers, so you are in fact paying the about the same price in the end, so why not change to the better food.
I will not be going back to Bakers even though they eat it no problems, at least with a better brand it have all the vitamins and minerals and goodness, with no fillers or fat etc......So you are saving money with not having to buy vitamins to suppliment the vitamins that are not in the Bakers or Chum.
I am converted after going through all the details and looking up the site to say what are in the food etc. Every one have their own preference to what food they can afford and want to get for their pets, but in the long run you are wasting money. This is now my opinion. I look at it this way,,,,I paid a good amount for my 3 Chihuahuah's and my Shih Tzu so I want whats the best for the all. AND I HAVE NOTICED A BIG DIFFERENCE IN THEIR POOS TOO, NOT SO MANY YAYYYYYYY.....xxxx