Well good debate thought i might add to it, I have one KC reg and one not , both from same breeder , i paid the same price for both, i have no time for Kc im afraid, what does it matter to me i dont want to breed but if i did, i know all parents of my dogs are kc reg just the one pup i have thats not, and there are genuine reasons for this, i can remember a time when no one KC there dogs unless they had money whats all the fuss about it now, i have had dogs all my life some KC some not, my last was beautiful pedigree long line but i was not told to get her spayed or anything else yet the people i got her from are well known good breeders, i cant see the point of these endless threads on KC reg, some people dont want there pups KC reg and dont like the company its all money in the end, and some people like crosses, i have had lots of everything, and all have been good healthy dogs , but then im just a simple person who has my dogs for pets to love them so what does it matter, really,

I agree with much of what you say Jeanie, but what I don't understand and would be interested to know why from someone who owns/breeds non registered dogs that are DLRC registered, is why register with DLRC which is just a glorified certificate writing service trying to appear as if it's proper registration? Why not simply leave them unregistered?

I agree with you Dundee, but i also cant see why the kc reg have to always be the top dogs, as from my breed alone i have seen some really bad examples on show so i would like to know , how are they any better than anyone else, and i still think it all comes down to money in the end, im not expert in any field just my own opinion , i see and know BSB thats dogs are KC reg, so i would love to know what the big fuss is about and what the point is, i would like to see someone do something to stop this, no one does, and maybe a whole new set up altogether.