Pet Forums Community

Go Back   Pet Forums Community > Dog Forums > Dog Breeding

Dog Breeding Discuss all topics related to responsible dog breeding. Including help and advice on dog breeding issues regarding the mating process, pregnancy issues, post birth issues and all other related topics.

Registered users don't see this ad - Register Now (It's free!)
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-2010, 03:13 PM
Pet Forums VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,091
rocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant futurerocco33 has a brilliant future
Re: Fit for Breeding Legislation, Please read!!!!

Quote:
When buying a puppy people consider if the puppy is KC registered, so why not DNA
There are plenty of people who aren't bothered whether the dogs is KC registered.

I don't think you can compare the UK to Sweden. They have a very different attitude to dog ownership - they also have a different attitude to teenage pregnancy and don't have the numbers of teenage mums that we have here!

The Swedish rules you refer to apply to KC registered dogs and most will only consider a KC registered dog. Not so here. There are still crosses bred without the rules - my Swedish lodger's mother had one such litter However, it is attitudes towards dog ownership that are different, not the law.

Quote:
once laws are imposed people would initally stop breeding as they wouldnt want to break the law, we have seen this first hand with the docking ban.
If only................

Can I ask a question? If you consider this workable, why hasn't it worked with pit bull ownership and breeding in the UK? The DDA was introduced in 1992 - it made ownership/breeding/selling of pit bulls illegal. Those already in existence were allowed provided they were registered and neutered (so not being able to breed). If people didn't want to break the law there would be no pitbull (or their crosses) in the UK. Any surviving would have been pups when the Law was introduced and so be 19 years of age - a stretch for most breeds. If people don't break the law - how come there are so many still around and so many being bred?
Reply With Quote
Registered users don't see this ad - Register Now (It's free!)
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-2010, 03:21 PM
Pet Forums Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Chancepixies is on a distinguished road
Re: Fit for Breeding Legislation, Please read!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by swarthy View Post
They don't - look around you - many puppy buyers couldn't care less whether their pup is KC registered - many have absolutely no idea what it means (and even more so since that d*mn programme) - I would estimate around 70 to 80% of puppy buyers don't even know about health testing - and those that have never encountered any problems as a result of buying this way will continue to think along those lines.

Puppies are being weaned onto poor quality foods and sold to new homes at 4/5 weeks old - this is - and always has been illegal - but it is STILL happening.

The marketing initiative required to get this message across would cost millions - and if that money is to spare - why more use it to properly educate prospective puppy owners on what they should be looking for and what to avoid?

As I've already said - I actually support the concept of DNA profiling - why? because it is a better failsafe against theft / dogs being returned than either chipping or tattooing.

=================

You could quite easily end up in a situation whereby people who have bought on a whim end up dumping the dogs rather than go through the hassle of DNA profiling - those turned away from training clubs will decide to go it alone - and we could ultimately end up with MORE abandoned dogs and more dumped because they don't behave - when ultimately the owner is at fault.

We could also end up with many more sick dogs as people start avoiding vets if they decide to keep the pups.

People really DO NOT care - if they are not bothered about health testing - what on earth suddenly makes you think they will be bothered by this?

And for what it's worth - no - I don't think it right that people don't care - but that's sadly the way it is.

And without education, the situation I've alluded to above will continue to deteriorate
What would your suggestions be to stop over 100,000 dogs being killed every year, Chancepixies sees both sides, we breed pedigree working and show Dobermann and rescue dogs from death row. We would be happy to take on both responsibilities.

Take a look at this video, these were the last dogs we rescued from wales, PF heaven, yet we sell our puppies to responsible people willing to work with us throughout the dogs life to ensure no troubles are had, behaviourally or circumstantially. May i also add, if if we were able to contact the breeders with these dogs then we would be able to home much more easily.

Welsh Death Row Dogs
Chancepixies Animal Rescue

On this link you will also see Chancepixies response to the proposed Puppy Farm Legislation
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-2010, 03:31 PM
Pet Forums VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Surrounded By Idiots..
Posts: 6,066
Devil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond reputeDevil-Dogz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Fit for Breeding Legislation, Please read!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chancepixies View Post
What would your suggestions be to stop over 100,000 dogs being killed every year, Chancepixies sees both sides, we breed pedigree working and show Dobermann and rescue dogs from death row. We would be happy to take on both responsibilities.
So do alot of other breeders. Us being one, we do transport runs, donate to rescues and do foster for two - as well as breed show dogs. I know of many breeders within our breed that also breed to keep a show pup but also work very closely with rescues.
Not all breeders believe that there is no rescue problem, we all know there is.
problem is its not the ethical breeders that are adding to that problem - its the unethical lot, and the ones adding to the resuce problem are the ones that will find ways around any laws you want to try and enforce.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 30-11-2010, 03:45 PM
Malmum's Avatar
Pet Forums VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Essex.
Posts: 7,495
Malmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant futureMalmum has a brilliant future
Re: Fit for Breeding Legislation, Please read!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chancepixies View Post
That is a very good point, do you think it lies somewhere between the breeders vetting out the right homes, and having good communication and follow up advice, long after the point of sale. This is a policy we ALWAYS stick to and currently have 3 dogs we have bred in our rescue. The biggest key factor here is when know so much more about these dogs we have bred, their pedigree health, behaviour, puppy development, experience in its homed life and can make a far better judgement as to what home that dog should go to than the death row dogs we have no history on. Themore we know about the dog the more likely we are to find it a better home the second time.

We highly appreciate your comments and have found them very useful
I'm on the other side of the fence here - had a litter sprung on me at 7 weeks gestation, didn't know they'd mated. Tried to do the best, health tested mum & dad after I knew of impending litter, mum after pups left. So in a way a kinda BYB myself One of "that lot" if you like!
Did everything in my power to find the best homes, even spayed the one bitch pup and one remaining boy at 7 months to protect them. Contract (though useless really) stating possible health issues so no breeding and pups to be neutered, endorsements on all pups. I have been lucky in that my buyers are now my friends - purposely made it that way by constant support and contact. All remaining boys now neutered.
However I did have a pup returned to me at two years of age and completely agreed with why they returned him - didn't really but didn't want them feeling guilty and not bring him back.
I would be devestated if any of these ever ended up in rescue and if there were a way it could be guaranteed all pups would return to their breeder, I think it would be wonderful.

Like you say, you bring a pup into this world you owe it to the pup/dog to continue to be there for it - regardless, but you can't always trust people to be open and honest if they want to re home it in the future, so some sort of breeder identification would be a good thing.

Bringing any life form into the world carries responsibilities, just recently a thread on here showed an 11 year old Malamute up for re homing. Luckily there weren't many breeders of them around then and Mal breeders knew her line - she is now back with her breeder.
They say on that forum "If you can't take a dog back anytime between 6months to 12/14 years of age you shouldn't be having a litter" I think that's right!

PS. Couldn't watch your video - sorry - too emmotional for me!

Just like to add that PF's & BYB's are breeders too and yes I do believe that all breeders should have to put their hand in their pockets for health tests, DNA tests, legal contracts and puppy tax (if it were aplicable) take a dog back regardles of age and have to support owners, if needed, throughout the dogs life. Legal requirements.
Everyone always blames the PF and BYB, of course they are the main problem but you only have to look at the BRS to see that many ethical breeders also breed far too much. Not all breed to keep a pup for showing and some breed multiple different breeds with litters in every edition. Not all ethical breeders are as ethical as they'd like you to believe, being part of the ABS is no guarantee that they are not over producing. Even healthy dogs can and do get over bred!
__________________
Flynn - Kali - Britches - Bruce - T-Bo - Marty



"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, and the strength of the wolf is the pack"

Last edited by Malmum; 01-12-2010 at 08:55 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
breeding, dog, stray dog

Sponsored Ads


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All posts made on this forum are NOT monitored.
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:41 PM.


PetForums is part of the Pet Media group of websites including | Pets4Homes | PetsLocally


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2