
22-01-2012, 08:22 AM
|
|
Pet Forums VIP Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,528
|
|
|
Re: Jelly vs Pate
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkbetty
What makes the pate type foods preferable to the ones in jelly, in the Bozita range, for example. Is it just because if there is jelly then there is less meat? Or is it something about the manufacturing process/contents? I've seen lots of you mention this but I haven''t been able to work out why. I have one particular little miss who loves to lick the jelly off!
|
The bolded is the main consideration because the proportion and quality of the meat has knock-on effects in terms of nutrition, energy etc. As less meat is used in cubed food as they contain a whack of jelly/gravy, this drives up the moisture content of the food. While moisture is a good thing, you can have too much of a good thing in canned food as this in turn is having a knock-on effect on nutrient levels (protein, fat etc). So, quite a lot of the money that you pay for that food goes towards paying for the unnecessary jelly/gravy filler (jelly/gravy tends to be around 50% of these foods).
I need to pop out now but if no one has illustrated the difference by the time I come back I will give you a couple of examples.
And yes, then there are the manufacturing considerations. In order for food to be cubed and most importantly remain cubed, it gets compacted and additives (e.g. binders) are added so that they hold the shape and do not disintegrate in the jelly/gravy. However, even with pate food you need to add additives so that it doesn't just turn into hard lump of something in the tin.
|