Pet Forums Community

Go Back   Pet Forums Community > Cat Forums > Cat Chat

Cat Chat Chat about our beloved cats and kittens. Discuss anything cat related in this forum.

Registered users don't see this ad - Register Now (It's free!)
Like Tree7Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 24-08-2011, 10:39 AM
Pet Forums VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: oxfordshire
Posts: 3,437
Images: 4
kelly-joy is a jewel in the roughkelly-joy is a jewel in the roughkelly-joy is a jewel in the roughkelly-joy is a jewel in the roughkelly-joy is a jewel in the roughkelly-joy is a jewel in the rough
Re: Please Sign and help to stop this

I was made to believe it is so I am guessing it is, saying that though anyone can made one up
__________________
Reply With Quote
Registered users don't see this ad - Register Now (It's free!)
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 24-08-2011, 10:42 AM
Pet Forums VIP Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,528
hobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Please Sign and help to stop this

Quote:
Originally Posted by RainbowMuncher View Post
Is it a proper petition or not?
It is a proper petition but based on flawed information.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 24-08-2011, 03:25 PM
RainbowMuncher's Avatar
Pet Forums Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 60
RainbowMuncher is on a distinguished road
Re: Please Sign and help to stop this

Quote:
Originally Posted by hobbs2004 View Post
It is a proper petition but based on flawed information.
Thankyou What kind of flawed information?

RainbowMuncher xx
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 24-08-2011, 03:32 PM
Pet Forums VIP Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,528
hobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond reputehobbs2004 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Please Sign and help to stop this

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleo38 View Post
The proposed European Directive 2010/63/EU (new changes to proposed for animals used in scientific research) is actually tightening up current EU law which although the UK has high standards alot of EU countries only meet the bare minimum.

Are you against this when it will acually help improve the lives of many animals????? or maybe I'm missing something ........

If anyone wants to actually read this then here is the link to the proposal http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...33:0079:EN:PDF
Quote:
Originally Posted by hobbs2004 View Post
Flipping heck, how many threads are there of this?

I have posted this on the other threads now but I will post it again

am going to reply quite uncharacteristically for me with: What a load of tosh.

It is quite clear to me that instead of reading the actual directive (or even just searching for the word domestic within it if you cannot be bothered to read the whole, exceedingly dry document), you have taken the DM and the Sunday Express as your sources of information. Never a good thing to do imo without double-checking the original document.

The directive makes reference to "domestic" about 4 or 5 times; always in relation to feral or abandoned animals of domestic species. However, they are named to make clear that these are not going to be experimented on unless there is clear medical need to use this population (transmitted diseases from the feral population).

Overall, the way I read this is that this is a TIGHTENING of regulations that PROTECT animals more so than it has before for countries that have so far only signed up to the most minimal of protection. Any regulations that a country already has that are even tighter than what is included in the doc here will remain in place.

Perhaps, it would be prudent to also post this:

EUROPA - Press Releases - Questions and answers on the new directive for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes

and the tabloid story debunker site:

Tabloid Watch: The EU doesn't really want your 'pets' for drug testing
IMO, a lot of hot air based on a DM/Sunday Express interpretation of it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Ads


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All posts made on this forum are NOT monitored.
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 AM.


PetForums is part of the Pet Media group of websites including | Pets4Homes | PetsLocally


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2