Quote:
Originally Posted by ratticus
I also know that to own a dog under the dangerous dog act means no life for the dog, e.g tagged, snipped, tattooed, musseled etc.
|
Just wondering why you would still want to own a dog with these limitations of the DDA regulations? Surely it would be better to own a breed that you could take out with you wherever you wanted, and that could have the freedom of any other dog?
Not wanting to cause arguments, just thinking aloud!
