Exactly Nina,
It is MY Choice to totally disregard anything which has come from unreliable sources such as Peta.
As I said before the links offered are either links to Peta or Uncaged,rather than from reliable independant sources.

I have never defended Iams but there are two sides to every story,I would prefer to make my choice based on Hard facts and evidence,the link you provided in the first post for example,The report, written by the paper's Health Editor Lucy Johnston drew largely on findings by the animal rights organisation Uncaged.

As I said I don't feed Iams, and I have never stated Iams don't test,however you need to look at all the evidence from various sources to get a clear indication of what testing is taking place etc.

So for me,unless there is hard evidence with references to independant companies who have researched the claims I will take it with a pinch of salt.

It's about making an informed choice,we can't make or force someone into taking on others value's.