Quote:
Originally Posted by englishrose943
Well i am no way a byb and i register my pups with the DLRC. IM SICK TO DEATH WITH PEOPLE CALLING PEOPLE WHO HAVE DOGS REGISTERED WITH THE DLRC. My dogs were registered with the KC and now changed to the DLRC.
I do not overbreed,am in contact with all my buyers and offfer a lifetime help if they have to rehome their pups.My pups are spoilt,loved andv very socialised and not caged up and just bred for the money .I only breed if people are waiting for pups or if i want a pup myself
There are too many KC first classs snobs on here and they are no different than me and im sick of hearing that the KC are better the DLRC.
|
KC snob or not,I think it is the way forward and breeding needs to be regulated.
As a Breeder you must be one of a small minority who registers with the DLRC,who does things properly but I will stick to my opinion which I am entitled to.
The majority who register with the DLRC are known puppy farmers and BYB,I wouldn't wish to be assiociated with a club who activitly supports this cruel evil trade and allows pups with there registrations be be sold in pet superstores.
I think it is positive action by the KC asking for legislation and if it puts the DLRC out of business so be it,
My post which you quoted is true.How can you trust a club that doesn't have a code of ethics,allows puppies with their registrations to be sold in commercial outlets,that actively support puppy farming and that doesn't have an accurate database of pedigree dogs,a club which makes up peds,dogs are down as bitches and vice versa,and sometimes these peds are made up of several dogs which are a completely different breed.
As a Breeder myself I wouldn't touch them with a 50ft barge pole,nor would I ever recommend someone buys a puppy with DLRC registration.