View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 25-05-2008, 11:01 PM
Nicci's Avatar
Nicci Nicci is offline
Pet Forums Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the naughty corner
Posts: 993
Nicci has a spectacular aura aboutNicci has a spectacular aura aboutNicci has a spectacular aura aboutNicci has a spectacular aura about
Re: Do You Think There Is Need For 'New' Breeds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by garydogz View Post
Again yes but the question is how extreme do those circumstances have to be and are they the same for all breeds. This is my point about "against nature". Staffies, for example, are far quicker to "turn" than say a poodle and can inflict far more damage as they are bred to do just that.
I can't say any breed is quicker to turn that any other, I've always found Bully breeds infact the complete opposite...

Whenever there is a mention of a dog attack the press never make public the kind of homes the dogs are from (something that really gets my back up!) for instance some people assume that it's actually okay to tease a dog for example and think it's funny when their children are seen to be doing the same I would say that this would be more than likely be probable for 50% of dog attacks on children, attacks where it never gets a mention what the child was doing before the dog bit them, I firmly believe most if not all dog attacks are purely down to bad ownership/poor socialisation cases of people not being fully aware of what they have on the other end of the lead.
There is ALWAYS a reason why a dog chooses to bite any dog that is and its not about singleing out specific breeds because they happen to meet the press's critera of selling a piece of rubbish that belongs in the bin.
__________________
www.cynomania.com
Reply With Quote