Quote:
Originally Posted by billyboysmammy
To be honest i'm pleased with the KC response
|
I too am pleased with the KC's response. I also think it's very telling that their response is forward-looking, whereas the RSPCA is still bleating on about the same old same old.
However, when you read the quote from the report by Bijou below:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou
here's an interesting quote direct from the report which the R---A have ommited to mention
" However the real problem lies with the fact that many breeders are not registered at all and puppy farmers are also unlikely to be registered which means they are breeding with no regulation at all. while APGAW has focussed it's attention on dogs registered with the kC it is not possible to ignore the issue of puppy farming and irresponsible breeding particularly as it has been clear that many welfare organisations, veterinary professionals and pet owners beleieve they are reponsible for a large proportion of the dogs who suffer from poor welfare breeding "
|
it makes you wonder why the Kennel Club was the focus of this committee in the first place. If APGAW believe that it has been clear that many welfare organisations, veterinary professionals and pet owners believe
puppy farmers (and NOT the KC) are reponsible for a large proportion of the dogs who suffer from poor welfare breeding, why are the issues surrounding them not being dealt with in this enquiry?
Could it be because they, along with the RSPCA and the dreadful program PDE, felt that attacking the Kennel Club was much easier than going after the real criminals - ie the puppy farmers?