View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009, 09:02 AM
xxwelshcrazyxx's Avatar
xxwelshcrazyxx xxwelshcrazyxx is offline
Pet Forums VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BEDLAM HOUSE LOL
Posts: 27,268
xxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond reputexxwelshcrazyxx has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Why is pedigree or bakers bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirky47 View Post
If people keeps on saying bad things in that brand, better consult to a vet. This person can recommend what's best for your dogs.
I find personally that the vets tend to push the brands they stock, like Hills Science Plan etc. Which can work out alot more expensive expecially if you have a larger dog. There are alot of other makes which are just as good and alot cheaper especailly for family's on budgets and the dont even have to go with the cheap Bakers or Pedigree Chum. My dogs were very hyper on the Bakers and I didnt realise how hyper until i changed their diet to James Wellbeloved. My chi's are on Royal Canine at the moment until they are one then I will change to another brand which is as good but cheaper. xxxxxxxx
__________________

siggie by Dawn............Smudge'smummy

Glitter Text Maker
Reply With Quote