|
Re: Why against cross breeds?
There have been numerous studies that show that the health of cross-breeds is on average better than that of pedigrees.
'Several studies have shown that mixed-breed dogs have a health advantage. A German study finds that "Mongrels require less veterinary treatment".[4] Studies in Sweden have found that "Mongrel dogs are less prone to many diseases than the average purebred dog"[5] and, referring to death rates, “Mongrels were consistently in the low risk category”.[6] Another study reports that “The median age at death was 8,5 years for all mixed-breed dogs and 6,7 years for all pure breed dogs... For each weight group, the age at death of pure breed dogs was significantly less than for mixed-breed dogs”,[7] and a study in Denmark finds that "Higher average longevity of mixed-breed dogs (grouped together).[8]
I cannot believe how aggressive some people are in attacking those who want to buy cross breeds? It seems ridiculous to me. And many arguments seem to suggest that those who deliberately cross breed are after money - a bit of a strange argument really considering that pedigree dogs are also sold for money..
There also seems to be belief that buying from a 'reputable breeder' ensures there will be little risk of ill health - not so. I just read a really sad story in Dogs Today magazine, about a woman whose Pug (brought from a reputable breeder and thoroughly checked) was plagued with ill health and had to have numerous operations on various breed-specific conditions.
I'm not here to criticize pedigree dogs or breeders - I just really am shocked at how annoyed some people get with those who are interested in or own cross breeds.. I really can't understand it.
|